Anonymous Belfast

Scientologies REAL View toward Civil Rights (Part two - Genocide)

Lets further examine this seemingly genocidal view of removing or deleting a vast cross section of humanity from society.

$cientologists which Ive spoken to are quick to insist that L Ron Hubbard was not advocating genocide. This counter argument is both valid and accurate, based on their view of what death is. The belief is that removing these low toned people from society would be of great benefit by preventing the contagion of their aberration from spreading. There is additional context to be considered. The text does provide one alternative to quarantining broad segments of humanity from society, which would be to permanently raise their tone through Dianetics Auditing. Taking this into consideration, there is much reason to be thankful that the $cientology Cult has not been granted the power it has been seeking. The ideal world being promoted is one in which anyone considered low on this arbitrary scale would be removed from society, unless they themselves submit to begin processed by the Scientology Cult.

Chapter 13 lists; back-stabbers, people that talk behind others backs, hypocrites, perverts, turn coats, subversives, introverts, those with low self esteem, unreliable friends, gossips, unfaithful wives and card cheats. It clearly states These people are insane, and have no honor decency or ethics. Such people should be removed from society

The chapter 21 reference specifies those that are dishonest, devious, perverts, blunt or brutally honest. It goes on to state these people should not be given more freedom in the society than the chronic psychotic, should not have any civil rights.. The only answers would be the permanent quarantine of such persons from society to avoid the contamination of their insanities.

The broadest reference is the one previously stated, from chapter 27. The sudden deletion of all individuals occupying the lower bands of the one scale would result in an almost instant rise in the cultural tone.

To have a reasonable and worthwhile social order it is only necessary to delete those who range from 2.0 down or simply quarantining them from the society. A full list is not provided. However, it does say within the text that this includes nags, critics, hypnotists, anyone who threatens of punishes others, cries for pity or lies for sympathy .. Those who are gossips, controlling, contradictory, And anyone who counters the beliefs of others.

The real question, which remains unanswered, is what would this purging of undesirables from society entail? Would they be cast out to die from starvation or exposure to the elements? Would they be locked up in some asylums for those which are seen as suppressive by the $cientology Cult? Or, perhaps their thetan(their soul in $cientology terms) would be liberated from their physical body?

Certainly one would think that $cientologists would find this view objectionable. What of compassion, empathy or sympathy for their fellow man? Surely these things are important?

On page 8 of Advanced procedures and Axioms, By L Ron Hubbard it plainly states Everything which is wrong with him, he has selectively chosen to be wrong with him. Which may further explain why sympathy is referenced as being misemotional within the texts,

I must point out that this isnt merely sympathy which is being referenced. A full description of their usage can be found on page 44 of the same book. Sympathy can be mechanically considered as the posing of any emotion so as to be similar to the emotion of another.

On that same page it refers to their usage of sympathy, which would be empathy to the rest of us, as being between 0.9 and 0.4 on the tone scale. Which would indicate that allowing oneself to connect with another on such an emotion level is seen as being, what they would call non survival, and thus wrong.

The 11th act of clearing, as referenced on page 29 consists of running out all SYMPATHY on everyone and anything in this lifetime, across every dynamic.